DO VIDEO GAMES ENCOURAGE VIOLENCE OR PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS?

By Abigael Ngina 

Video games have been a source of both entertainment and controversy for decades. Some people argue that violent video games make players more aggressive, while others believe that games can improve critical thinking and problem-solving skills. In my opinion, video games are more likely to enhance problem-solving abilities than to encourage real-life violence.

Many video games require strategy, planning, and quick decision-making. Puzzle games, strategy games, and even some action games challenge players to think ahead, analyze situations, and develop creative solutions. Games like Minecraft or Legend of Zelda ask players to solve complex problems, manage resources, and build structures, which can translate into real-world skills such as logical thinking and perseverance.

The link between violent video games and actual violence is weak. While some games contain violent content, most players do not act violently in real life. Factors like upbringing, mental health, and environment influence behavior far more than a game. Playing a violent game can even provide a safe outlet for emotions without causing harm to others.

Video games also teach collaboration and teamwork. Multiplayer games require players to communicate, cooperate, and coordinate strategies with others, strengthening social and problem-solving skills that apply to school, work, and daily life.

In conclusion, video games are tools, not triggers. While concerns about violent content are understandable, evidence suggests that games are more beneficial for developing problem-solving abilities than promoting aggression. Moderation and guidance are key, but blaming video games outright misses their potential for learning and growth.