By Faith Cherop
President Donald J. Trump returned to the White House from his New Jersey golf resort on Saturday and, within hours, authorized a coordinated military strike on three Iranian nuclear facilities, dramatically escalating U.S. involvement in Middle East tensions.
In a primetime address, flanked by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Vice President J.D. Vance, Trump confirmed that American bombers, in coordination with Israeli forces, had targeted and destroyed key Iranian enrichment sites in Fordo, Natanz, and near Isfahan — areas believed to house or process near-weapons-grade uranium.
“All three were completely and totally obliterated,” Trump claimed, though Iranian authorities have not verified the extent of the destruction.
Gabbard Absent Amid Disputed Intelligence
Conspicuously absent from the announcement was National Security Adviser Tulsi Gabbard, who earlier this year testified before Congress that Iran was not actively pursuing nuclear weapons. Responding to a question about her prior statements, Trump dismissed them: “I don’t care what she said. I think they were very close.”
The strikes mark a historic shift in U.S. foreign policy, placing Washington in direct military conflict with Tehran and further entrenching it in Israel’s ongoing war against Iranian proxies across the region.
Bipartisan Political Backlash
The decision sparked immediate and intense backlash from both Democrats and a growing number of Republican lawmakers, many of whom questioned the legality, timing, and strategic clarity of the move.
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) condemned the strikes as “disastrous” and called them grounds for impeachment, accusing Trump of dragging the country into a war “that may ensnare us for generations.”
Republican voices also joined the dissent. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) and Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) both criticized the strikes as reckless and unconstitutional, citing a lack of congressional authorization.
“No president should be allowed to unilaterally march this nation into something as consequential as war with erratic threats and no strategy,” said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, who noted he received only a “perfunctory notification” with no classified briefing.
House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries added that Trump had “misled the country about his intentions, failed to seek congressional approval, and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East.”
Strategic Stakes and Global Uncertainty
Iran, which had previously warned that any direct U.S. involvement would prompt retaliation, has not officially responded but is expected to take action in the coming days. Analysts now fear the potential for reprisal attacks on U.S. military bases, diplomatic missions, and regional allies — or even an acceleration of Iran’s nuclear development, should its facilities remain intact.
Trump’s decision also marks a stark departure from his “America First” campaign promises, which emphasized non-intervention and withdrawing from endless wars. Instead, the 45th president now finds himself at the helm of a high-stakes military confrontation — one that could define not only his presidency but also the future of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.
As global leaders call for de-escalation and Congress demands answers, the world watches with uncertainty as tensions rise in one of the world’s most volatile regions.
0 $type={facebook}:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.