Trans Nzoia Governor George Natembeya has called on the Inspector-General of Police to explain the repeated withdrawal of his security detail, arguing that any decision affecting his protection must comply with the Constitution and the rule of law.

In a statement, Natembeya expressed concern over what he described as the second time his security had been withdrawn, demanding a formal explanation from the relevant authorities on the reasons behind the decision.

The governor cited Article 47 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, which guarantees every person the right to administrative action that is lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair.

He noted that the Constitution also provides for written reasons where administrative action adversely affects a person's rights or fundamental freedoms, insisting that decisions concerning his security must follow the applicable legal procedures.

Natembeya further cited Article 238(2)(b), which requires national security to be pursued in compliance with the law and with respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.

He also referred to Article 244 of the Constitution, which requires the National Police Service to maintain high standards of professionalism and discipline while respecting human rights and human dignity.

The governor called on the Inspector-General of Police to clarify whether the required security procedures had been followed and to provide a formal explanation for the repeated withdrawal.

He also drew attention to a High Court ruling reported on June 3, 2025, concerning the withdrawal of security assigned to five governors.

According to Natembeya, the court held that withdrawing security without prior written notice, an opportunity to be heard and written reasons violated Article 47 of the Constitution.

He urged the relevant authorities to take the judicial pronouncement into account when making decisions affecting security arrangements for public officials.

The Trans Nzoia governor, however, clarified that he was not opposed to lawful security reviews, saying such exercises should be conducted professionally, objectively and in accordance with the law.

“I do not claim immunity from lawful security reviews. What I insist upon is that any such review must be conducted professionally, objectively and in accordance with the Constitution, without discrimination or improper political influence,” he stated.

Natembeya maintained that the security question would not distract him from carrying out his constitutional responsibilities as governor, pledging to continue serving the people of Trans Nzoia County.

He called on the relevant authorities to clarify the circumstances surrounding the decision, explain the reasons for the repeated withdrawal and ensure that appropriate security arrangements are maintained in accordance with the law.

“The Constitution is binding on every public institution. No exercise of public power is above the law, and no Kenyan should be denied procedural fairness,” Natembeya said.

The governor's statement places renewed focus on the constitutional safeguards governing administrative decisions and the procedures public institutions are expected to follow when making changes to security arrangements for elected leaders.