ODM Leaders Split Over Zoning Plan Ahead of 2027 Elections.

By Shakland Masese 

A growing rift has emerged within the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) as party leaders publicly clash over a controversial proposal to zone political strongholds ahead of the 2027 General Election.

The debate centers on a potential pre-election coalition between ODM and the United Democratic Alliance (UDA), with some leaders advocating for zoning arrangements that would see certain regions reserved for specific parties to field candidates unopposed. Proponents argue that such a strategy would strengthen coalition unity and improve chances of winning key seats, including the presidency.

However, the proposal has sharply divided opinion within ODM ranks. Lang’ata MP Felix Jalang’o dismissed the idea, warning that zoning could stifle political competition and undermine the ambitions of emerging leaders. In a strongly worded statement, Jalang’o argued that democracy should allow voters to decide freely, regardless of political agreements.

The controversy was sparked by Alego Usonga MP Sam Atandi, who insisted that zoning would be a central pillar in any agreement with UDA. He maintained that ODM must safeguard its traditional support bases, particularly in Luo Nyanza, and prevent rival parties from fielding candidates in those areas.

Homa Bay Town MP Peter Kaluma has also thrown his weight behind zoning, describing it as a practical strategy for securing electoral victory and ensuring effective governance. Kaluma warned that ODM could opt to contest elections independently if its strongholds are not respected in coalition talks.

On his part, Mathare MP Anthony Oluoch defended zoning as a necessary compromise in coalition politics. He argued that without structured agreements on candidate placement, coalition partners risk undermining each other, potentially weakening their overall chances at the ballot.

The disagreement highlights the delicate balancing act ODM faces as it navigates coalition negotiations while trying to maintain internal unity. Analysts note that zoning, though common in coalition arrangements, often sparks resistance due to fears of limiting democratic choice and political growth.

As discussions continue, the outcome of the zoning debate is likely to shape ODM’s strategy and influence the broader political landscape in the run-up to the 2027 elections.